@SanderK said:
I guess the License Manager app could periodically check the validity of the license currently coupled to the device and disable it if the server tells it to. That way the license can be decoupled from a device without giving you the ability to keep using the old device in an activated state. This of course requires the Pi to have an internet connection, so I see how that could be a flaw in the system.
In this case, activating the device and removing the License Manager application afterwards would give you a fully working system with no restrictions even with working internet connection (including updates). This would certainly promote fraud, since unlimited number of devices can be activated by re-associating the same license.
As I have mentioned above, there is no technical way to "decouple" a license. Even with a possibility to remove and invalidate a license on one device, we would still need creating a new one, which can be associated with the new hardware. Re-associating an existing license (if made possible) might additionally lead to unforeseen legal and tax consequences, since a clear mapping between licenses and devices they are used would be lost. I am sure we could re-invent our whole architecture, but I don't see a necessity for doing so.
@Jimmy06 said:
Well you have as the product never activated to start with but consumed the license. I replaced the hardware as it was faulty and cant use what I paid for because it wrongly activated on the broken device.
The license was consumed by a working (at least up to that degree) device. We have no possibility to keep you from activating a license on a device you want. If it was your own mistake, we will be glad to offer you a new license for a discounted price, but I don't see how this justifies withdrawal from a valid contract.
@Jimmy06 said:
On the broken device it also says Evaluation constantly.
So the old device is still working? Can you please provide us more information about how it was activated and whether this issue existed from the beginning? We will be happy to fix the problem on THAT device.
@Jimmy06 said:
either way per device does not indicate that it's limited to one device forever either. That could mean a multitude of things.
I don't agree with you on that. Neither does the general definition of this word (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/per), putting "per" on the same level as "for each". This exactly matches our model - you have to pay for each device you would like to use our software with. I am sure this wording is used commonly on the internet for the description of licensing models.
@Jimmy06 said:
I can only activate windows on one device but nothing stop s me going and activating it on another one deactivating the first device in the process. This needs to be made clearer.
We are not Microsoft, our resources are limited. But I have already recommended you reading our license agreement carefully - it explains all the details in a very clear manner. BTW: it is way shorter than the one in Windows.